Git rebase has a lot of cool extra features that make this command fun. Don't make that mistake! Use interactive rebase Needless to say, that will not make people happy. If you upload your rebased master branch to the main repository, you can rewrite your teammates commits with your own new commit history. Multiple team members working on the main branch may have added a few commits to the master branch tip.
Since you are essentially rewriting project history, working on public repositories can cause a lot of havoc. If anyone else is working on that repository, hands off! 👐🏽 There is a rule of thumb with using git rebase: never use it in a public repository.
#Rebase to master git code#
Remember, messy code with multiple merges, branches, and extra commits can start to look pretty chaotic! 😜 ❌ Don'ts with git rebase This type of organization helps with creating a visualization of relevant commits to those outside of the development team. With git rebase, they can be combined to create one master branch without a lot of messy commits in different orders. Now, when exactly would you want to do this? ✅ Dos with git rebaseįor example, let's say that the second half of the master branch was being created separately on a local repo with a feature branch. The commit history for the branch has been rewritten with fresh new commits. Also, the commits that were in the feature branch are all new commits after the tip of the master branch. You will see that now the feature branch has been tacked right on top of the master branch. Now let's get a visual of how it looks: Adding feature branch to master with git rebase. Next, run git rebase to add the feature branch to your master: git checkout feature
First, you will switch your working directory to the feature branch. Imagine you are on the master branch, and instead of using git merge, you want to use git rebase as your command. Let's look again at the master and the feature branch. Git rebase also combines two branches and save the commit histories however, there is a big difference in the way it is executed. The command to complete this merge while working on the master branch: git merge feature A new merge commit is created to combine the commits of the master and the feature. The HEAD of the branch is where the branch is ready to merge with the master branch. The master branch shows an additional three commits that happened with the feature branch built as a result. A merging a master and feature branch would look like this: Add commit history of both branches using git mergeĪs you may recall, the base is where the feature branch was first created off of the main repository. Although both commands combine branches, they work very differently and serve different functions. Now let's talk about another form of combining branches: git rebase. With git merge, you are able to combine the two unique histories of both branches without compromising any of that history as the commits were formed chronologically.
#Rebase to master git how to#
You learned how to use git merge to combine two branches. Quiz: Define procedures for effective organizational strategies in teams Quiz: Manage your code using advanced versioning techniquesĮnhance your Github experience with extra toolsĪutomate processes with GitLab continuous integration Use subtrees and submodules to add a public repo to your project Learn branch management with git merge, git fetch, and git pull Quiz: Identify how to correct common errors when using GitHub Turn back time on your mistakes with git resetįix up individual commits with git logging techniques Manage common issues when working locally and remotely with Git Handle those mishaps on your local repo like a champ Quiz: Explain how to save your code locally and remotely using GitHub repositories Write code efficiently by using a local repositoryĬontribute to an open source project with basic commands on Git Play around with Github on your own account Dive into Git's superpowered advantage: version control
0 kommentar(er)
